Malaysia wants to make preschool compulsory from age five under the 13MP. See why countries such as France, Hungary, Brazil and Greece introduced similar policies.
No, preschool is not compulsory in Malaysia yet. Under the Thirteenth Malaysia Plan (13MP), the Government plans to make preschool compulsory from the age of five, but a final nationwide enforcement date has not yet been announced. The Education Ministry has said implementation will require wider access to preschool and stronger parental awareness of the importance of early learning.
Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek said the move will require Malaysia to expand access to preschool education while helping parents understand the importance of early learning. The 13MP also calls for more Ministry of Education preschool facilities, particularly in rural areas.
Preschool is already part of the national education framework, and the Ministry of Education states that preschool opportunities should be available regardless of family income, location or ethnicity. But attendance was never made compulsory.
So why is Malaysia willing to go one step further and require children to attend preschool?
Several countries have already done it, often because voluntary preschool systems were still leaving certain children behind.
Malaysia’s current rationale is mainly about expanding access to early education and ensuring more children benefit from it before primary school.
The Education Ministry has not yet announced details of how compulsory preschool would work, but Fadhlina has said that implementation will include widening access and engaging parents on the importance of early learning.
This is important because making preschool compulsory is not simply a question of changing the law, families also need realistic access to a preschool.
That is where the experience of other countries becomes useful.


The common pattern is clear.
These countries did not make preschool compulsory simply because early education was considered beneficial. They did so because voluntary participation was still leaving measurable groups of children outside the system.
France was trying to reach its final few per cent. Hungary wanted to bring disadvantaged children into education earlier. Brazil made preschool part of compulsory basic education. Greece was dealing with a striking gap between participation at age four and age five.
The clearest measurable effect has been higher preschool participation, although the scale differs because each country started from a different point.
These results should still be interpreted carefully. Making preschool compulsory was not the only thing these countries did. Many also expanded public places, funding, staffing or access at the same time.
But the data show that compulsory preschool can be an effective tool for bringing more children into early education, especially when it is supported by sufficient public provision.

The biggest lesson is simple: Malaysia cannot require every five-year-old to attend preschool unless families can realistically obtain a place.
Brazil is particularly instructive because compulsory education is not only an obligation on parents. Access to compulsory basic education is also treated as a public right, and public authorities have duties to provide it.
Malaysia already appears to recognise this challenge, with the Education Minister highlighting the need to expand access before full implementation.
Compulsory preschool does not automatically eliminate educational inequality.
Its most direct effect is usually getting more children into preschool.
Hungary moved from 74% enrolment among three-year-olds to 81%, while Greece eventually achieved near-universal participation at the compulsory ages. France, which already had very high participation, used the law mainly to reach the remaining children still outside preschool.
Malaysia should therefore judge the early stages of the policy partly by whether previously underserved children are actually entering preschool.
The purpose is not merely to produce a higher enrolment percentage.
Brazil's experience suggests that attending preschool can lead to measurable later educational benefits. The 2025 study found improvements in both Mathematics and language, with larger gains among disadvantaged students.
That supports the broader idea behind compulsory preschool: children who might otherwise miss early education can benefit from entering the education system earlier.
Different countries interpret compulsory preschool differently.
Hungary requires at least four hours of attendance per day. France requires regular attendance from age three. Brazil makes enrolment compulsory from age four and defines preschool as part of basic education.
Malaysia will eventually need clear answers on issues such as attendance requirements, exemptions and which preschool providers qualify.
A compulsory policy only works if the education system can support it.
Malaysia will need sufficient preschool places, trained educators and accessible facilities, including outside major urban areas. The 13MP already points towards expanding Ministry of Education facilities, particularly in rural areas.
The international experience therefore offers a fairly clear lesson.
Making preschool compulsory can increase participation and help reach children who might otherwise miss early education. But the success of Malaysia’s policy will depend just as much on access, capacity and quality as on the law itself.
Not yet. Malaysia is working towards making preschool compulsory from age five under the 13th Malaysia Plan. The Education Ministry has said it is currently expanding access and engaging parents before full implementation.
The proposed compulsory preschool age is five years old. Malaysia is moving towards having children attend preschool at five before progressing into primary education.
Preschool is not currently compulsory for all Malaysian children, but the Government is working towards changing this. The policy is intended to widen access to early education and encourage children to benefit from preschool before entering primary school.
No. Nursery or childcare for younger children is not the same as compulsory preschool at age five. Malaysia's current compulsory preschool proposal focuses on children from age five, rather than making nursery attendance compulsory for toddlers.
No. Malaysia's proposed compulsory preschool policy is focused on age five, not age three. Families may choose to enrol younger children in nursery, kindergarten or other early childhood programmes, but attendance at age three is not part of the proposed compulsory requirement.
At present, preschool attendance is not compulsory. However, once compulsory preschool is fully implemented, parents will need to follow the requirements eventually set by the Education Ministry.
The terms are often used interchangeably in everyday conversation, but they can refer to different types of early childhood provision. For this policy, the important point is that the Government is proposing compulsory preschool education from age five.
The detailed implementation rules have not yet been fully announced. This includes questions around which public, private or other preschool providers will satisfy the compulsory requirement. Parents should wait for formal Education Ministry guidelines rather than assume that every provider will automatically qualify.
The Government is working towards compulsory preschool under the 13th Malaysia Plan, but the September 2026 announcement did not provide a final nationwide enforcement date. The Education Ministry said access still needs to be expanded before the policy can be fully implemented.